<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jay-Z + Apple = Record Label?</title>
	<link>http://www.50leaves.com/apple/osx/itunes/jay-z-apple-record-label/</link>
	<description>"100% Unadulterated Apple Porn"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruel</title>
		<link>http://www.50leaves.com/apple/osx/itunes/jay-z-apple-record-label/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.50leaves.com/apple/osx/itunes/jay-z-apple-record-label/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Amazon however did offer the album and for $7.99.
With more and more attention being given to Amazon perhaps it will become a competitor, in which case both Apple and the record industry will need to change their ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon however did offer the album and for $7.99.<br />
With more and more attention being given to Amazon perhaps it will become a competitor, in which case both Apple and the record industry will need to change their ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
